|
|
12-20-2008, 09:22 AM | #1 |
Major General
720
Rep 6,860
Posts
Drives: 2014 BMW 435i X-drive
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Reston, VA
|
M3 Vs Volvo XC-90
ok this is a theoretical thread
i was having dinner with the family and i was telling them that i got some winter tires for my M3 and i said my car will be unbeatable in the snow my wife giggled so i told her you will appreciate them when your volvo XC-90 gets stuck, and i have to pull you out, she laughed even more then the kids asked which car would win a tug of war contest i said probably in the snow the volvo would win as its AWD and can put down its power more effectivley so even though it only has 208hp it can probably put down all those 208hp mine has 414 but the rear tires would probably start spinning and i can't use those 414hp. i said in the dry i would whip the volvo the M3 weighs 3704lb with winter tires the volvo 4450lb with almost worn all seasons am i correct? that the m3 would lose in light snow but would win in the dry? or is it not about power but more about weight? |
12-20-2008, 10:10 AM | #2 |
Lieutenant Colonel
207
Rep 1,864
Posts
Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
iTrader: (2)
Garage List 2016 Porsche GT4 [0.00]
1999 Porsche Spec B ... [0.00] 2014 Ram 1500 Laram ... [0.00] 2007 Porsche GT3 RS [10.00] 2013 Tesla Model S 85 [0.00] |
There's only one way to know for certain, video or ban!
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2008, 11:31 AM | #3 |
First Lieutenant
21
Rep 362
Posts |
Comment just on winter tires and drive wheels. For the most part winter tires alone make a world of difference. Here's a C&D article on the topic with summary comment.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/hot_lists/high_performance/performance_files_tested_by_c_d/winter_traction_test_what_price_traction_feature/(page)/1 "So What's the Bottom Line? Four-wheel drive helps get cars going. When it comes time to brake or change direction on low-traction surfaces, the extra mass of the driveline becomes more of a detriment. Folks who live in hilly places that get snow may need the climbing capability of four-wheel drive. If it snows a lot in those hilly places, they should probably invest in winter tires, too. Even flat-landers who happen to have steep driveways may wish to consider a four-wheel-driver. Almost everyone else will most likely be better served by using winter tires. Acceleration takes longer, but in an emergency, the handling behavior and improved lateral grip of two-wheel drive and winter tires -- in the slippery stuff -- are the safer bets." |
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2008, 05:44 AM | #7 |
Major General
1207
Rep 8,034
Posts |
Power has little to do with it, it's all down to weight and contact patch to the road surface. As the Volvo has similar torque and weighs more and has more contact patch (4 driven wheels) it will win.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2008, 08:32 PM | #8 | |
Major General
720
Rep 6,860
Posts
Drives: 2014 BMW 435i X-drive
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Reston, VA
|
Quote:
keep in mind the volvo is normally fwd until the front wheels start slipping then power is applied to the rear the volvo has 235/65 17" tires all around the M3 has 245/40 and 265/40 18" |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2008, 09:26 PM | #9 |
Private First Class
7
Rep 152
Posts |
This actually very funny as my wife and I both drive the same exact cars...maybe I should chip the Volvo..I wish she would let me drive the M!!
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2008, 10:21 PM | #10 | |
Colonel
99
Rep 2,000
Posts |
Quote:
Bruce |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2008, 11:09 PM | #11 | |
Major General
720
Rep 6,860
Posts
Drives: 2014 BMW 435i X-drive
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Reston, VA
|
Quote:
the total weight for the volvo was 4450 and the M3 was 3704 you think the back wheels of the volvo only have 450 lbs so it would be 2225 Vs 1852 in a perfect 50/50 balance i know the M3 is close to that i doubt the XC-90 is |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2008, 11:45 PM | #12 | |
New Member
0
Rep 28
Posts |
Quote:
On dry pavement even though the Volvo would have more friction, whether it would be able to take advantage of that extra available friction depends. While some posted the torque numbers for both cars, the true number would come down to the final gearing of both cars. Between the M3's sticky tires, higher torque numbers, and possibly lower gearing, it might be enough to win a tug of war. If the M3 could use launch control i think it would definitely win. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-23-2008, 03:54 AM | #13 |
Major General
1207
Rep 8,034
Posts |
OK, you doubters that the Volvo wouldn't win. Lets change the vehicles, say a Merc SL65 vs a humble tractor.
The Merc has far more power and torque compared to the tractor, which would win? In fact take it a stage further, the Merc against 8 mens. Still think the car would win? It's all about weight/traction and Bruce is correct, the M3 only has half of it's weight over the driven wheels where as the Volvo has all it's weight as both axles are being driven. P.S. Not an XC90 vs M3 but you get the point. http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/show/ep...episode7.shtml Last edited by footie; 12-23-2008 at 09:45 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-24-2008, 10:28 AM | #14 | |
New Member
0
Rep 28
Posts |
Quote:
Also as long as the M3 had MDM enabled it wouldn't allow the wheels to spin, still keeping the higher static friction coefficient. Once the chevy started spinning the wheels he was done for. The M3 would put up a much bigger fight than that. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-24-2008, 10:40 AM | #15 |
Major General
720
Rep 6,860
Posts
Drives: 2014 BMW 435i X-drive
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Reston, VA
|
i guess there is only way to decide this
just have to convince the wife that it won't hurt the volvo i still think other factors are involved her tires are almost worn out my tires have less than 2800 miles on them and i am betting on my rear tires (powered ones) have 265/40 rubber her front ones (initial powered ones till they slip) have 235/65 tires so initialy i should have more friction, bigger contact patch when her front tires start to spin when i overpower them then the drive starts getting diverted to the rear of the volvo by then, once here fronts are spinning i would have started to pull away |
Appreciate
0
|
12-24-2008, 12:10 PM | #16 | |
Major General
1207
Rep 8,034
Posts |
Quote:
It's solely a contest of weight and friction, though it more to do with weight than anything else. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-24-2008, 02:02 PM | #17 |
Major General
720
Rep 6,860
Posts
Drives: 2014 BMW 435i X-drive
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Reston, VA
|
that's the thing though
the SUV in this case is not 4wd, its AWD normally its always front wheel drive till it detects slipping in the front wheels so it starts diverting up to 65% of the power to the rear wheels if it was full time 4wd it would be no contest my guess is if i can overpower the front wheels and they start to slip once the power is diverted to the rear the front wheels are already slipping and the back wheels will not have enough traction of the car is being pulled backwards and they too will start to spin |
Appreciate
0
|
12-24-2008, 02:43 PM | #18 | ||
Major General
1207
Rep 8,034
Posts |
Quote:
According to a Landrover mechanic I spoke to all AWD SUVs are only two wheel drive, meaning one wheel at the front and one at the rear, only diff lock locks in the drives together. What he meant by this I haven't a clue, like everyone else here I assumed AWD meant all wheels driving all of the time but apparently not. Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
01-25-2009, 09:42 PM | #19 |
Lieutenant
19
Rep 432
Posts
Drives: 2009 Melbourne Red Coupe - DCT
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Seattle (Puyallup)
|
This went from a funny thread to a physics course.... yawn. I still say +1 for the video! Hahaha.
__________________
2009 Melbourne Red DCT | Black Interior | Carbon Fiber Trim | Carbon Fiber Roof | Cold Weather | Premium | Technology | 19's | Smartphone Integration | iPod |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|