^^ Thanks Swamp. I do see the figures to be dead on with the second results(40,000miles). But if you look at the first figures(new), it is the same difference that your getting with the IS-F results. Around 0.4 secs. Since your calculation with the program is giving you around 4.7 or 4.8 with the ISF, it is possible that it could be off by 0.3 to 0.4. In other words, 4.2 might not be as imposssible as you may think, but 4.4 is probably more realistic and logical. Not to say that this proves anything. But it does show some kind of consistency.
Zero to 60 mph:
4.5 sec / 4.8 sec
Zero to 100 mph:
11.2 sec / 12.0 sec
Zero to 130 mph
20.1 sec / 21.2 sec
Street start, 5-60 mph
5.2 sec / 5.5 sec
Standing 1/4-mile
13.1 sec / 13.4 sec
@ 107 mph @ 105 mph
