View Single Post
      07-07-2011, 02:03 AM   #19
swamp2
Lieutenant General
swamp2's Avatar
United_States
609
Rep
10,407
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roman@ESS View Post
When proper hardware / software engineering and testing are done there is little risk involved in adding proper boost levels to the S65. You run into reduced safety margin and risk engine failure when software is not properly developed, you depend on a helper such as methanol or you attempt to push boost levels beyond the limit of what the motor can safely handle.
Not to nitpick too much but I will take exception to this. Let me reword...

Even with "proper" SC hardware, software and testing you will have reduced safety margins in any engine.

It all comes down to longevity. More power produces more stress on a variety of components not just engine internals. The lifetime of a stock M3 engine can be very long but supercharging will, statistically speaking, shorten the engines lifetime, both for the failure of internals and other components.

There is no practical way for any small FI company to duplicate (or even get close) to factory endurance and stress testing.

All the being said, AA does have a wonderful reputation and if I even went FI I would go with you guys and a SC kit.
__________________
E92 M3 | Space Gray on Fox Red | M-DCT | CF Roof | RAC RG63 Wheels | Brembo 380mm BBK |
| Vorsteiner Ti Exhaust | Matte Black Grilles/Side Gills/Rear Emblem/Mirrors |
| Alekshop Back up Camera | GP Thunders | BMW Aluminum Pedals | Elite Angels |
| XPEL Full Front Wrap | Hardwired V1 | Interior Xenon Light Kit |
Appreciate 0