Thread: DYNO!
View Single Post
      07-11-2012, 01:28 AM   #26
C|3R1C
So Kewl Guy
C|3R1C's Avatar
49
Rep
619
Posts

Drives: 2010 E93 M3 DCT
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by m3alabama View Post
I don't get it. You put intake and tested it but at the same time you went from HFC to catless. Yet you chalk up the power increase to the intake? I am sure it is the catless that is repsonsible for increased power and not the intake!
I dont feel like I can credit +12 RWHP to +6 RWTQ to just HFC and catless. So after discussing it with EAS and researching about how much the change could actually make, I make my final decision that catless could add at most 1-5 RWHP and a little bit of torque, the rest remeasured up to the intake being reinstalled more carefully (by me both times). So my conclusion is that it does make power, how much is variable between cars.

I actually have a theory that maybe going catless let the car breather easier by moving more air through the system, but thats only a though with no real evidence lol.
__________________
2010 E93 M3 / MS Catless X-Pipe / AA Catback / Vorsteiner Vented Hood and Bootlid E93 Trunk / ADV1 7.1 Wheels GB / LS3 LED Lights / Harrop Supercharger
Appreciate 0