The lesson learned: Do not enter a gunfight without bullets.
Right makes might. The buyer was initially right but once the seller stepped up to its mistake, it turned the tables by standing by what is right and doing the right thing. What company in the public light wouldn't? The buyer gave the seller an opening to turn the tables.
Who is it that has not been forthcoming? Which party is it that is typically the one that goes silent? Who was initially silent and is now happy to be in the spotlight? Which party is making the other party clear the facts rather than tell it themselves? Do they need to?
My only concern here had been that neither party had been forthcoming. Who is making us look bad now?
My favorite part of Maledon's post:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Maledon
Husker does not seek to silence or in any way limit the rights of those who wish to express their opinions on this now widely publicized ordeal. But based on several reckless distortions and omissions of fact, the dealership and its employees have been grossly mischaracterized. Husker acknowledges and commends the comments posted by Mr. Tanisaka, his attorney, and the many others that have requested the personal attacks to cease. Husker would ask Mr. Tanisaka to go one step further and provide his truthful commentary on his agreement, or disagreement, with the statement of facts set forth above.
Husker will hold the vehicle in inventory for Mr. Tanisaka until the end of business Monday. For the sake of all involved, Husker BMW would like nothing more than to have this saga end with Mr. Tanisaka proudly driving his new E90 M3 and showcasing his “Husker BMW” plate frame throughout Southern California.
|
Lol. This is like a big FU in response to the public's jokes and remarks. It is basically saying: Ownage Reversal.
They are telling you to speak all you want, and it can as well. They are in the now right. Sure; go ahead, add a Husker license plate frame onto the car. Do it.