View Single Post
      08-23-2008, 12:12 AM   #13
ToothDoc
Second Lieutenant
5
Rep
241
Posts

Drives: 997.2 TTS, CLA 45 AMG
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chicagoland

iTrader: (0)

It's 5 seconds slower than the E60 M5. The IS-F is a little more "safe" in the handling department and doesn't quite have as good traction due to no true limited slip diff. I wouldn't say it's so slow.

BTW, the M3's 8:05 isn't a fully stock M3. It had optional race brake pads on the front axles and were running CUP tires and not PS2s. Maybe that's why the new tranny hasn't been reported (but probably tested) - as equipped with PS2s and standard pads, they're probably running SLOWER than 8:05 (my speculation).

Got my flamesuit on...
Appreciate 0