View Single Post
      02-28-2021, 05:03 AM   #61
CSBM5
Brigadier General
CSBM5's Avatar
2756
Rep
3,361
Posts

Drives: 2019 M2 Comp, 2011 M3, etc
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Greenville, SC

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by leftfootbr8king View Post
You can tell how stiff the e46 is by looking at all the welding that needs to be done on the subframe to keep it from ripping out of the car.
No question the E46 is from the old era before body-in-white torsional and bending rigidity took their big leap forward which occurred with the E9x generation (took place with the E39 generation in the 5 series). You can immediately feel the structure higher natural frequency when you back to back and E90 with an E46 or earlier. BMW published a nice paper for the E90 years ago showing how those improvements were made, how they employed very high and ultra high strength steel at various places particularly at the highest stress locations in the body, etc.

As to the rear subframe mounting points ripping out on an E46, one would assume the designers clearly underestimated the factor of safety needed for that area of the structure (since they obviously underestimated the amplitude of the cyclic stresses experienced). It's clearly not the best design by a wide margin, but it does come from earlier days still in CAD/FEM (i.e. early 1990s design work). I'm sure if they could do it over again, they'd easily fix that area plus the front strut top mounting area along with many other improvements. How cool would that be if BMW did a run of E46 body-in-white shells with greater than 100% improvements in torsional and bending rigidity along with fixing all the poor design locations plus using modern E9x era and forward ulta-high strength steels?
__________________
Current Stable:
2024 G20 M340i Melbourne Red/Cognac
2019 F87 M2 Competition 6MT, LBB, slicktop, exec pkg
2007 E91 328i Silver, slushbox, Eibach fr/E93 M3 rear sway bars, ARC-8
Appreciate 2