Quote:
Originally Posted by NeoE46
For me something was strange about the results. The things mentioned in the article and on the video that are wrong with the Mustang (shocks too soft, body roll, nose dive under braking, shocks can't handle speeds above 60 mph, etc.) are all things that should have killed the car on the track, especially for the regular Joe as they unsettle the chassis and driver confidence to push hard. In this case, the regular Joe pushed harder with the unsettled chassis. I find this odd. Not saying it isn't true, just odd given the characterization of the suspension, not to mention no talk of brake fade given the heavy nose diving of the car on the track.
|
The mustang does suffer from nose dive, and the Pro guy did say he felt the mustang had better brakes. i think its just a reflection on how the BMW has better quality overall, thats were the 22k difference goes to use.
the mustang has good quality but, we have to remember Both cars have different quality standards.