View Single Post
      09-20-2007, 12:02 PM   #22
JEllis
Major General
JEllis's Avatar
532
Rep
5,498
Posts

Drives: E36 M3, E92 M3
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
With results like that, surely the margin for error in these numbers is very big. Its not impossible the GT3 will be faster than the Turbo on some courses, but this seems very hard to believe. Same day, same driver, I do doubt the numbers will look like this.

Good job to M3 though. CLK black certainly looks fantastic, and performance is good too, but the price is so insane. Surely the profit margins on this car are just ridiculous. They ought to make this the regular CLK63, and price it like the C63 (thereby requiring a price adjustment on all CLKs, yes). Why not? Its as if they do not want to try and make a run at E92/E93 M3 customers. They only want to compete with the E90? I just don't understand it.
Huh... Turbo 996 beating the GT3...are you serious?

The GT3 is basically a race car for the street. Especially the 996 version.

The 996TT is not much lighter than the E92 M and less competition prepped than the GT3.

Now the GT2...thats another story all together. A head to head between a 996 GT2 and GT3 would be an awsome comparison!

Jason
__________________
http://www.m3post.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic14547_7.gif
Instagram: jellismotorwerks
Appreciate 0