Quote:
Originally Posted by regular guy
That's very odd feeling of security because the results at this moment are far worse than expected. Most people (myself included) believe the actual failure rate of the S65 to be < 1%. I also consider < 0.1% to be normal for a well designed engine -- making a 1% failure rate 10x higher than expected. As of now, this poll is showing 3.5% failure rate which is far worse than it should be. Even though I think this is the best poll set up thus far, it still shows the flaws in self participation internet polling.
|
3.5% or even 5% is not that bad, considering how a lot of those cars are abused, SC'ed, running on lower octane gas etc.
Funny how some said you are biassed even though your numbers and my numbers were much lower.