View Single Post
      03-08-2013, 01:56 PM   #7
R3DL1N3
Enlisted Member
3
Rep
47
Posts

Drives: Looking to purchase 1M
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada

iTrader: (0)

[QUOTE=GammaZeta;13605933]
Quote:
Originally Posted by R3DL1N3 View Post
The convertible, to me, is a complete waste of what the car represents.(QUOTE]

Yes, because sacrificing the wind in your hair and connection to the elements is worth the .003 seconds gain around The Ring.
Typical forum response. It's funny though how I'm referencing the fact that the coupe was what the chassis was designed for, not the convertible. Nothing wrong with a car that was built to be a convertible (ie: s2000/boxer, etc) and designed as such to provide such an experience. I certainly don't care about the ring time at all, but the fact you are missing significant structure either means you add it somewhere else (weight - which the toyota most certainly cannot afford) or chassis flex. If you want a cruiser with the top down go and buy one, but don't be a fanbois on the forums when someone calls out the fact that toyota has marketed this car for enthusiasts with the driving feel and then decides to lop the roof off. If you havent figured out that this isn't exactly the best recipe to achieve it, don't blame me.
Appreciate 0