Quote:
Originally Posted by southlight
Thanks guys!
BTW: I added these in-gear acceleration figures to the first post:
| E92 M3 | RS5 | in-gear acceleration | 4th/5th/6th/7th | 4th/5th/6th/7th | 80 - 100 kph | 2.1s/2.6s/3.1s/4.2s | 2.6s/3.4s/4.2s/5.5s | 80 - 120 kph | 4.4s/5.4s/6.1s/8.1s | 5.1s/6.7s/8.6s/10.8s | 80 - 140 kph | 6.6s/8.2s/9.3s/12.0s | 7.7s/9.8s/12.9s/16.6s | 80 - 160 kph | 8.9s/11.0s/12.8s/16.3s | 10.4s/13.1s/17.2s/22.6s | 80 - 180 kph | 11.4s/14.2s/16.8s/20.9s | 13.4s/16.7s/22.2s/29.4s |
Best regards,
south
|
The elasticity of the S65 is amazing. In every gear and every range the M3 is quicker. Even from way down in higher gears such as 6th, for example, where the RS5 is obliterated by over 4 seconds in an 80-160kph run!
The higher the gear and greater the range the greater the discrepancy. All hail the S65 M3.