Quote:
Originally Posted by -=Hot|Ice=-
The GT-R will kill the M3 in any performance category you put it in. It deserves the praise it gets. I know how to read and you bashing members for praising the GT-R is what everyone here saw. Posts aren't bias, they're the truth. The GT-R for the money(and for those who can put up with it day to day) is a budget supercar. The M3 is a wannabe sports car. It tailors more towards comfy cruising.
|
Find the quote that I bashed a member for choosing a GT-R, seriously. PM it to me, you're fluffing this thread enough as it is.
Two quick points.
1. Your first statement is exactly the type of post that I go after. In this post you throw the M3 under the bus and ride off in a GT-R, that is just naive. You are comparing apples vs. oranges, the M3 is 40k less, and -100hp. I'm not even sure why you would post this response as you just did, I clearly stated that the M3 is not in the same segement, market, or perfromance group as a GT-R, yet you seem to come back and want to remind me that the GT-R "kills the M3". The playing field is not even between the GT-R and the M3, stop posting as if it is. This entire performance bargain comment is getting stretched out the door, maybe in the used market but at 100k, you have a lot of other great competitors like Viper, Corvettes, etc.
2. Posts are biased, your opinion is your opinion and that is it. People are constantly throwing their own opinions around all day, hence the forum idea. Example, your opinion is that an M3 is a "wannabe sports car", that is clearly not the truth.
Don't mistake my issue with the choice of a GT-R over an M3, it's more against these types of posts (the one you just made). There is no need to constantly throw down the M3 to put the GT-R up. BMW already made a GT-R killer, it's called a 335ix. J/k couldn't resist.
Also, notice how I posted something positive about the GT-R, and yet you somehow turned it negative...That is trolling.