View Single Post
      02-05-2014, 09:37 PM   #130
Billj747
Captain
Billj747's Avatar
United_States
162
Rep
658
Posts

Drives: Everything
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SoFlo

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrStinky View Post
Wow Id love to believe this but given they said the tune shifted peak torque over 3k rpms to right, I'm thinking maybe wasn't dynoed right. Not that ESS isn't great tune but no way its 30whp
Did you read the whole article and look at the dynograph on page 2?

The torque curve was raised with a 19lb-ft average gain and looks identical in characteristics to stock. The torque curve in the S65 is extremely flat and has two ever-so-slight humps, one at 3,900rpm and the other at 6,900rpm that are almost identical in peak torque.

The tune just gave the 6,900rpm hump a slight increase to be the new torque peak. There is not an erroneous 3,000rpm horizontal shift in the dyno, which was done by Roush Yates Engines -the NASCAR engine building organization.

There was a 24whp PEAK gain, and a 29whp MAXIMUM gain (at 6,400rpm) -which is actually incorrect because there is a 32.84whp MAXIMUM gain at 6,812rpm (303.22whp vs. 336.06whp).
Appreciate 0