Quote:
Originally Posted by 997GT3
Thats SOP for all those high end vehicles.
It's a low production numbers will guarantee a few hundreds super rich guys will buy them.
The LFA is a great car but not $400k great. And what's an "it" factor? Really.
Snob appeal? The GTR redined performance in the not too insane price range.
The LFA hasn't refined anything. If I had $400k to spend on one sports car it wouldn't be an LFA. Practiaclly any Ferrari or Lambo would be preferable.
I'd probably opt for the upcoming GT2 or Turbo S over it.
And I would guess most car nuts would buy something else too if given that choice. How about you?
|
I thought we were talking about 20 years down the road. Chances are, the GT-R's will be driven "as they should be" by that point in time. I'm not saying I would drop $400k on the LFA. I simply stated it'll have more "it" factor than the GT-R in 20 years.