Quote:
Originally Posted by 997GT3
I love it. You can't even define supercar. It all comes down to "exotic intangibles".
And what are exotic intangibles? Low production high priced badge whore exclusivity snob appeal?
|
Exactly, super car is not just performance, a turbo civic would be a super car if this were true.
There is no logic by basing this argument soley on performance numbers, that would lead us to saying that a Corvette ZR1 or a Viper ACR is a super car, or any car with similar numbers would be a 'super car', I don't recall the EVO FQ400 being considered a super car, now was it??*
Quote:
Originally Posted by 997GT3
That speaks volumes about the PEOPLE not the CARS. Get the difference?
|
This is an interesting point, I think what speaks volumes is how insecure some of the GT-R owners are, and even their fans. Spending hours on the M3forums, just to prove a GT-R is a great car, and if to project that M3 owners couldn't sneeze and buy a GT-R tomorrow.
I'm half tempted to but a GT-R and come to M3 forum and post about how I want my M3 back, oh wait, there already a handful of these type of members.
What is even more annoying is -=Hot|Ice=-, this guy is a real character, calling the M3 "pathetic", how can this be Hot|Ice, for the last 2 years, your avatar stated you would be getting a 2011, then 2012 M3, "Soon to come" yet, you seem to jump on the train and say that the M3 is a 'wannabe' and 'pathetic'
Either the M3 is a great car or it isn't, which is it?