View Single Post
      03-09-2007, 12:24 PM   #10
brandonlowe
Private
4
Rep
65
Posts

Drives: 11 E92 M3
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jackson, TN area

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkoesel View Post
There's no way the rears have an aspect ratio of 40. That would give them a noticeably smaller sidewall thickness and rolling circumfrance than the fronts. So that can't be correct. Doesn't mean the list is totally bogus but its a little suspect.
At those sizes the rear would be taller, not the opposite as quoted above.
Appreciate 0