Quote:
Originally Posted by footie
To me this is saying that it's very possible that given the conditions a 5 second variation could have be likely.
|
Nice wordsmithing. Previously you claimed Chris said that the poor weather cost 5-6 seconds or that good weather could decrease times 5-6.
That absolutely was not what he said. All he said was that on any given day with identical as conditions as possible on that day you will still see 5-6 second variations among repeated laps. This is absolutely not saying the same thing so thus your previous statement is still patently false. It is quite amusing to see how your own pro-Nissan bias affects your complete "reading in"/rewritting to what you want to hear, despite what was stated with perfect clarity.
Of course that being said water, track temp and air temp are very important factors that will each all push times positively in one direction or another.