Quote:
Originally Posted by graider
styling wise, the c63 just looks like it came straight off from the chrysler design studio. Cheap looking, there is nothing original or fluid about it. This apply to pretty much the entire merc lineup with maybe the exception of the sl65 black series.
so no, M3 hands down.
Speaking about sound. amg or any car in it class won't be able to beat the top end music produced by the m engine. I mean you have many car that sound similar to the amg such as s5, isf, rs4, vette, pretty much any low rev big displacement engine. But very few can produce the beautiful sound of the m3.
Stock m3 < stock c63 amg.
Aftermarket exaust m3 > aftermarket c63 amg.
|
Looks are subjective just like many qualities in a car. Your first paragraph however is the typical smear comments which at this point need no reply because they only support the weak opinion you have. A C63 doesn't sound like a S5, RS4, IS-F or a C6 Vette. All cars have a unique exhaust sound to each. Not to mention if your describing all those particular cars as "Low-Revving" and "Big displacement" you might want to get your facts checked especially on the Audi side. Furthermore how is it possible you can state stock for stock a C63 sound better but aftermarket to aftermarket a M3 sounds better? Have you watched any of those videos with the Evosport C63 running? You must think the rasp of the E46 M3 sounds good at 8000rpm as well. BTW I have owned that car as well and it probably has one of the worst exhaust sounds for a sports car ever.