View Single Post
      07-17-2011, 07:57 PM   #85
DLSJ5
Brigadier General
DLSJ5's Avatar
United_States
501
Rep
4,033
Posts

Drives: 2016 F82 M4 ZCP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyoshi71 View Post
I asked about a LC SC engine a while ago. Check out the pages & pages of interest from everyone...

http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=453291

Either way, I think LC on this engine is one of the smartest moves you can make to optimize power and keep it running strong for a long long time.

I'm not sure I agree with the few folks who recommend swapping cams. With just LC & a SC alone, you can practically keep the drivability of the car similar or exactly the same as stock while adding a ton of power. Cams change everything. Remember, its not like this car redlines at 5500 rpms and you've done changes that will now enable it to redline at 8400 rpms, which would then require cams that can keep up. This thing is already built to deliver to 8400+. To dick around with lift, duration & degree is asking for a huge headache. I would think vanos mapping would be sufficient? (my 3 cents)

to Drew. He's all in.
I love it when people use / apply objectivity and common sense, GREAT POST.

Always appreciate your posts, and thank you for the kind words!
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ
ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ
Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH
Appreciate 0