View Single Post
      04-22-2010, 12:22 AM   #98
rick_vor
Private
rick_vor's Avatar
3
Rep
73
Posts

Drives: 2011 1M, 2008 M5
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lafayette, CA

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richbot View Post
E90 is also probably cheaper to produce because the production volume of the E90 chassis is about 10x that of the E92. Economy of scale applies to everything shared between the E90 M3 and the regular E90 sedans, which are ubiquitous. So roofs, doors, trunk lids, taillights, most of the unibody, etc. are all produced in a much larger volume than the equivalent E92 parts. I don't think the carbon roof is the reason the base prices are so much higher, even though the moonroof is a no-cost option on the E92. The non-M E90/E92 have about the same price difference.
If you look at the 2008 production volume, the sedan production is about 2.5times the couple production. The economies of scale do apply of course but the marketing and perceived market value play a bigger role is pricing of cars. Coupes are "sportier" and command a greater value than "family" sedans.

2008 Production numbers:

2008 total 474208
e90 246231
e91 93191
e92 79248
e93 55538

sedans: 339422 72%
coupes: 134786 28%

Rick
__________________
2018 Mercedes E63S Wagon
2015 X5 M-Sport diesel - sold
2011 E82 1M - AW - loaded
2008 E60 M5, 2008 E90 M3 6sp, 2003 E46 330i ZHP Sedan - all sold
Appreciate 0