View Single Post
      10-28-2007, 03:58 AM   #25
paulyd
Second Lieutenant
United_States
8
Rep
278
Posts

Drives: 2009 M3
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chicago

iTrader: (0)

Didn't we already establish that the GTR is on slicks as swamp predicted?
It is stated in the citation to the ring time.

Why people are still trying to pretend that it is not on slicks is ridiculous given what we all know and do not know.

The regression is no longer even needed to prove that the GTR has an unfair advantage. It was on slicks. period.

Swamp prediction #4 (use of race tires) - correct.
People trying to pretend GTR has the handling characteristics of a UFO - wrong.
People pretending that kg/hp does not predict ring time - wrong (R square says it explains 75% of the variability)
People pretending that physics does not relate to this regression - wrong (physics is responsible for our one and only variable - kg/hp, which means it is the sole contributor to our least squares line).

Stay in school. Stats is cool.
Appreciate 0