[m33]

Originally Posted by Sal@Evolve

You want me to compare with an article that is testing a 535 non intercooled kit running very low boost? I think you can clearly see that it is completely irrelevant and does not show any comparison of a air to water to an air to air.

That wasn't the question I asked you. I asked if you had done any type of testing just like that. I provided the link for your convenience, not your insults.

Makes sense why I cannot actually answer it? Because there is no air to water cooling system involved in that test.
Is there a heat soak article on the 575-650 kits?

Now that we can see you misunderstood the question in the first place, the rest of this is just off topic and no need to answer.

Sorry, there is no being wrong here. Looks like you just didn't understand my reply to the heatsoak assumption you made on the AA kit.

Why have we not done such a test? Did ESS do that test or publish it anywhere? Tell me if here is such a test.
So why are you expecting us to do it if there is not? Especially since we are releasing info at the moment. I have asked you to be patient. You don't get that part though.
Just wait, it will come.

Do you actually appreciate that me stating the above makes you look like you did not at all think about your question? You do know that I am trying to avoid conflict and now that you have forced me to answer you have put me in a situation where I can be accused of potentially indirectly attempting to make you look stupid.
Don't blame me on this matter now.

Attempted insults? I think everyone can see what it is you are trying to do.
Try harder to bully.
Come back with debates which are logical please and in context with what's being said and compared.
That means we should compare apples with apples.

And clearly point out what you think is mumbo jumbo and let's allow the members here to point out to you what it actually means.

I don't see what ESS has to do with any of this because I just asked you if you had done that type of testing. It doesn't even matter if they did it or not because it's a simple yes or no question. I suggest you ask ESS if you really want to know.

As for mumbo jumbo, yeah when you fill pages of technical jargon without getting to the point or answering the question without throwing insults, I call that a bunch of mumbo jumbo.

You seem to have a great ability to turn every supercharger comparison thread into a spiraling disaster zone. Why is it you do this? Is your hatred of everything non ESS that severe? You cannot stand to see anything other than your preferred choice? This is how it is coming across. It does not look good and now another company is coming out you are just doing it all over again.

Sal your promise to publish the data later is all you needed to say in the very beginning. If you say you will publish it later, then why cant you say that 2000 words ago without all of the insulting mumbo jumbo? Publish it later is good enough for me and I'll definitely ask you about it later.

I'm simply not intelligent to work out rpm's vs gear ratios. I'm just pointing out to you - 8300rpm is your actual RPM limiter. Simple stuff. Apparently so.
You want to seriously test me?
Then be ready to be tested.

I get your point about 8300 vs. 8400. But you haven't shown any miscalculation based on either number. So if you're going to give a test, you better be able to pass it yourself instead of trying to make yourself look smarter than everybody else on the forum.