View Single Post
      06-20-2013, 08:25 PM   #143
bigjae1976
Major General
bigjae1976's Avatar
1571
Rep
8,076
Posts

Drives: 11 E90 M3 Individual
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX

iTrader: (22)

Garage List
2004 BMW M3  [4.50]
2011 BMW E90 M3  [5.25]
2013 BMW 328i  [5.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1MOREMOD View Post
I'm unsure. That's what I thought also but primebmws build that inspired this one is running -4.5 front and -3.5 rear and seems to work really well. Also has aero which may be the reason?
I would think that and their tire selection would necessitate more rear camber.

That's just an unusual number, it could be right. The key is to ask why -2.7 in the rear.

More negative camber in the rear will cause understeer. You might like it. I used to run -2.5 in the rear on my 330 and it did well but I would run into understeer around slow, tight corners but was pretty easy to control. Now I run the least amount of rear camber I can (-2.0 right now) without rubbing, That really makes the car rotate and oversteer more.
__________________
2018 F30 320iX Melbourne Red
2011 E90 M3 Monte Carlo Blue
2004 E46 M3 Imola Red
2000 E36/7 Z3 Steel Blue
Appreciate 0