Quote:
Originally Posted by jml
I am still sketched out by the AP team not publishing the mechanical bias. I don't buy their excuses and I think the kit (being sold by EAS) was thrown together by vendors in the US backed by some AP engineers dropping in some mechanical engineering marketing speak that is 100% correct, but not necessarily part of the product being sold. There is very little in the way of comparison between what is being sold under stillen and AP in the US and what we see in pictures on this forum used by racing teams.
I will admit this is engineering intuition and distrust of vendors backed with no data.
|
Hmmm, this sounds interesting. Does not sharing an engineering detail like bias (I assume you simply mean hydraulic ratio) mean the entire system and its origin is suspect? What excuses were made and who made them? What "marketing speak" is not 100% correct? Can you clarify exactly what information you want, what is missing and the differences among the kits from the various suppliers you mention? AP has a pretty darn solid reputation... Maybe getting OT here. Start another tread on this if you want to try to get to the bottom of something.