Thread: M3 v. C5 Z06?
View Single Post
      04-17-2008, 07:59 PM   #25
bruce.augenstein@comcast.
Colonel
99
Rep
2,000
Posts

Drives: 2017 C63
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manheim, PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by malter2.0 View Post
No, it would not pull on M3. C5 Z06 has slower time 0-150mph than E92 M3. It would very close with edge on M3. C5 Z06 is quick in 1/4 because it has excellent low-end and mid range torque.

C5 Z06 0-150mph 25.5 sec
E90 M3 0-150mph 24.9 sec
The C5 Z06 has lousy aerodynamics compared to the coupe, which explains how and why it comparatively tails off a bit at speed, compared to the M3 (and the current C6, at 23.5 seconds), At, say, a 75 mph cruise based on the OP, aerodynamics is nothing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by malter2.0 View Post
It is also incorrect that power to weight matters from those speeds. It matters from a dig and becomes less of a factor as vehicle picks up momentum. At those speeds gearing and aerodynamics are everything. Power to weight will matter at high speeds if difference is significant.
So, you're saying that at 75 mph, power to weight is unimportant, and aerodynamics and gearing rule? OK, first things first: I agree that power to weight matters most at a stop, and least when you're approaching top speed.

But, 75 mph? At that speed, the M3 probably needs about 40 hp to cruise, and the Vette, maybe 45? Everything you're making over that is available for acceleration.

Gearing? I don't get it. How does gearing affect all this in the slightest? I get that, at 75 mph, the M3 is at around 6000 rpm in third, making around 320 hp. The Vette is at around 4700, making around 350 hp.

How does gearing trump hp?

Bruce
Appreciate 0