View Single Post
      08-22-2007, 05:08 PM   #20
bruce.augenstein@comcast.
Colonel
99
Rep
2,000
Posts

Drives: 2017 C63
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manheim, PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
...[*]CarTest software NAILS the 0-60, 1/4 mi time and trap speed perfectly for the RS4 (test ref.) CT/actual 4.6/4.6, 13.2/13.2, 104/104. Note the great agreement between average CT predicted hp loss and measured peak loss. Anyway you look at the losses CT matches better on the RS4 than any of the BMWs.
Swamp, how would CT line up with an RS4 that went 12.9 @ 109.7, with a vehicle weight of 4110 pounds with driver?

This is from a Road and Track test last year, and those numbers more closely match what I have observed at the track. That C & D test was the slowest I've seen by far, and they mentioned an unavoidable bog at launch due to very good traction and hot weather.

Thanks,

Bruce

Last edited by bruce.augenstein@comcast.; 08-22-2007 at 05:09 PM.. Reason: spelling
Appreciate 0