View Single Post
      12-17-2007, 04:33 PM   #97
jaiman
Captain
20
Rep
658
Posts

Drives: very fast
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtPE View Post
please explain why the dyno graphs are doctored?

they can NOT be real...

HP must = Torque at 5250...MUST...it does not...
428 lb ft vs 465 HP

if this is 'suspect' why wouldn't the time be?
If a third party source, publishes a poorly put together document, it means the n-ring time that was verified by an in-car, time stamped video produced by Nissan must be rigged?

are you for real?


And swamp, the M3 is a great car. It won't be faster than the GT-R, probably won't be much cheaper either. It may have more status in certain groups, and will probably be easier to live with on a day to day basis. If thats what floats your boat, buy the M3. For people who want more performance for their dollar, they can buy the GT-R. But its getting kind of pathetic how you seem to be on a one man crusade against the GT-R.
Appreciate 0