Originally Posted by scottwww
You assume far too much. I do not support the Republican budget. I support cutting the budget relentlessly. Thought I have not followed him closely at all, what I do understand of him, I would say that the votes I would advocate would be closest tor Ron Paul.
When George W. Bush was running for the Republican nomination, I supported Alan Keyes. He was my candidate, and I still like him very much.
After George W. Bush was nominated, and November came around, I voted for the lesser of two evils, which was GWB.
I did not like George W. Bush. I never considered him to be a fiscal conservative, or up to the difficult task of saying no to his own party's Congress. I did like some of his actions on issues of concern to Christians. I supported his approach to dealing with terrorism with the understanding that the threat was imminent and grave. That time has passed. The threat from terrorism is neither imminent, nor grave any longer. It is time to regain our liberty.
Yet you openly state that you voted THREE TIMES for the Bush's, and you say you will vote for a Republican again, even though NONE of them will actually ever pass any legislation like you claim you want.
These are the "winners" you brag about in this thread? How great they have done at failing to pass any legislation at all?
PS -- I can't believe you got suckered into the "vote Republican to protect the US against Al Qaida/Osama Bin Laden" crap. Sucker.