Originally Posted by 1997gtx
^ While I half applaud you for thinking about this stuff, haven't you ever wondered why it seems that all the things you agree with in the Constitution should be kept 100% as-is, while the language you don't agree with you have to prod, manipulate, and circumvent the meaning?
I don't know what you are talking about. If it is about the "natural born Citizen" clause, then this might be a good place to discuss it, though the intent of this thread is to deal with evidence by quoting authoritative sources. Perhaps the discussion of what you mentioned would be of most value within the threads containing the manipulations.