View Single Post
      05-25-2011, 09:08 PM   #105
scottwww
Brigadier General
 
scottwww's Avatar
 
Drives: 07 BMW 335i Cpe, 05 Mazda RX8
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: USA

Posts: 4,759
iTrader: (0)

Send a message via MSN to scottwww
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11Series View Post
They have all been provided, and confirmed as valid many times.
Oh really? What judge has examined the paper document? What forensic analysis has been done?
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11Series View Post
Your inability to believe them without personally examining them in your own hands is YOUR personality disorder. It is YOUR inability to rationally deal with reality.

This is just like it was YOU that was the problem when you didn't believe Obama got Osama Bin Laden. This is no different.
I don't need to see the document. I would like forensic experts to see it. And if it were on evidence, then a judge to have a full hearing.

When/where did I not believe Osama Bin Laden had not been "got"? BTW: It wasn't Obama who did it. It was the Seal team in a mission approved by whatever military commanders do that, and also the president. It was Obama's duty to take the heat for striking within Pakistan without Pakistani approval. And I don't argue the matter except that we need to GTFO of the Middle East and other places.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 11Series View Post
For god's sake, will you answer this once and for all:

What CONTENT of this document does forensic analysis prove to be incorrect?
Nobody knows. The analysis hasn't been done on the paper document.
scottwww is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote