View Single Post
      05-25-2011, 08:23 PM   #86
scottwww
Brigadier General
scottwww's Avatar
United_States
167
Rep
4,759
Posts

 
Drives: 07 BMW 335i Cpe, 05 Mazda RX8
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Send a message via MSN to scottwww
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScotchAndCigar View Post
More hysterical, condescending hyperbole; nice move. And you wonder why people get upset with you
This is not a conclusion, and it is not my conclusion. Look up the word "conclusion" sometime. Rather, this is a statement of US law, as referenced by several knowledgeable people, some of them in this forum. You've seen this statement many times, and it is consistent with the resolution of Obama's actual elegibility. As I said, it would be incumbent upon you to prove this statement false, as you are the one arguing against the reasonable "conclusion" that this child status law explains Obama's eligibility. And until you provide an update to this particular legal statement, I have nothing to discuss with you.
If there is case law that what you say is true, what are the references?