The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
I certainly hope that this would be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. Unfortunately, I am not confident of the outcome. They are hell-bent on destroying the Constitution. They would probably say something like "no Warrants are being issued, so they don't need probable cause". Just the same stupid kind of reasoning that has been used in other cases.