Originally Posted by ragingclue
It's completely possible. But I believe he should be convicted of perjury as well.
That lying, cheating fucker.
Did he do something to "obstruct justice" while he was not testifying? I thought this whole ordeal was about what he testified about. Obviously some of the jury thinks he didn't commit perjury, yet those same people think he obstructed justed.
WTF am I missing here, and I am serious as a heart attack. Any lawyers in here?