Originally Posted by jeremyc74
You mean like unconstitutional wiretapping that's done without any sort of court scrutiny? I'll take terrorists over tossing out the court any day of the week.
There data is well backed and peer reviewed. If you're going to take issue with it and expect to be taken seriously, you're going to have to do more than just make a statement that it's unbiased. If you've got some proof they're scewing the numbers, I'd love to see it.
Untold numbers of people were about to die from all that crazy, dangerous wiretapping....
You want to be taken seriously posting a study done by the ACLU where the issue is LEO vs (alleged) criminal? Surely there are better and more reliable sources.
Maybe a Department of Justice backed study??
Look, if you want to use the ACLU study to back your argument, fine. That's your prerogative. I personally would take anything they publish on an issue like this with a grain of salt.