Originally Posted by technik
Not sure who said it was a 3.19% decline in elevation, but it's actually 2% so the run is more than valid.
I had the file checked out myself and with a very honest forum member that is a very straight up guy!
we would really want this to be the best for everyone.
if the number is valid we won't say its not.
60-130 times have very strict rules and I am pretty sure you know that.
thanks again for sharing. the 6.95 secs time is fucking blazing fast already!!!