Originally Posted by dr325i
Here is your statement from a few posts back, "That one definitely not perceived to be effective otherwise all nations that signed it would agree with this Iraqi war -- not only the uSA and UK" where you say that if UN Resolution 678 had been in effect in 2003 as well as in 1991, more nations would have supported the war. The fact is more nations contributed forces in 2003 than in 1991.
OK, if you say so...we're pulling two different ways. Look at the numbers:
1) # of countries in this Iraqi war
2) $$$ invested in the war
3) Lives lost in the war
4) Soldiers involved in the war
How can you even say anyone else but the US and UK contributed to it???