Originally Posted by Jaws
Wow, big stretch. Could they have been in Syria? Please show me the money flow. The Bush admininistration has shown no evidence of a link. I get a kick out of how you think 1990 UN resolutions some how have any type of relevence to the current Iraq war. Another stretch.
I am done with this thread, as you are obviously blinded by ideology. My view of the world is quite different than yours.
Yes, my world view is based on reality while you seem to be content to wallow in ignorance. I am glad you are quitting. Your ignorant statements simply confused the issue.
Have a good day!
For anyone else who may be following the thread, here is a link to UNSCR 1441
passed 8 November 2002. It states in part;
Recalling all its previous relevant resolutions, in particular its resolutions 661 (1990) of 6 August 1990, 678 (1990) of 29 November 1990, 686 (1991) of 2 March 1991, 687 (1991) of 3 April 1991, 688 (1991) of 5 April 1991, 707 (1991) of 15 August 1991, 715 (1991) of 11 October 1991, 986 (1995) of 14 April 1995, and 1284 (1999) of 17 December 1999, and all the relevant statements of its President,
Recalling also its resolution 1382 (2001) of 29 November 2001 and its intention to implement it fully,
Recognizing the threat Iraq’s non-compliance with Council resolutions and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and long-range missiles poses to international peace and security,
Recalling that its resolution 678 (1990) authorized Member States to use all necessary means to uphold and implement its resolution 660 (1990) of 2 August 1990 and all relevant resolutions subsequent to resolution 660 (1990) and to restore international peace and security in the area,
Further recalling that its resolution 687 (1991) imposed obligations on Iraq as a necessary step for achievement of its stated objective of restoring international peace and security in the area
Please read the whole resolution. It lays out clearly that the authorization to use force passed in 1990 was still in effect.