Originally Posted by news 4 u
Clearly shows your knowledge of F1. There is no possible way to say that one was better than the other. The "But if he didn't die..." argument for Senna cannot trump the actual results Schumacher put out because one case is an educated guess while another is solid fact. Sure, Senna maybe would have been better, but you can't have a firm argument when there's a maybe.
Yes. I agree there is no way to comapre two drivers from two different era. For that matter in any sport it is not a true comparison. Having said that all the pundits agree that Senna is argubaly the best driver.
One thing though Senna never got any favor from FIA