Originally Posted by G-Mach1
Clearly shows your knowledge of F1 .
Clearly shows your
knowledge of F1. There is no possible way to say that one was better than the other. The "But if he didn't die..." argument for Senna cannot trump the actual results Schumacher put out because one case is an educated guess while another is solid fact. Sure, Senna maybe
would have been better, but you can't have a firm argument when there's a maybe.