Originally Posted by ganeil
For 12 years we pushed Iraq to fulfill its obligations under the ceasefire agreement it made after its forces were removed from Kuwait. You continually attempt to separate the 2003 military action from the 1991 action but they are intrinsically connected. Just as you cannot understand the Second World War without an appreciation for the First World War and the Treaty of Versailles, you cannot remove the 2003 invasion of Iraq from the context of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait.
Again, the President was NOT the only one making the case that Saddam had stockpiles of chemical weapons and a bio-weapons program. President Clinton believed it in 1998 (as well as in 2003) when he launched airstrikes on Iraq. The UN Security Council believed it when it unanimously passed UNSCR 1441. I asked you previously to present a single credible person or organization that was saying prior to the invasion that Iraq did not have chem or bio weapons, do you have one?
As for your 9-11 nonsense, all those claims were completely debunked by numerous experts. That leader of the vast, right wing conspiracy, Popular Mechanics has all the facts here
Thanks for the link, as I stated before, I do not believe in the thories, HOWEVER, all of the "Facts" to the important things were supported by the Gov't employees...I don't buy that side either...
Clearly showing a small hole in the Pentagon wall...then it "quickly" collapsed, no more evidence...
Nonsence, could be. Same as the nonsence that Saddam has ever or would have ever done anything bad to us
. But you just don't care about those facts I guess... The "expert" Michael Moore has debunked those too...if you want to look at it that way...