Originally Posted by pawarrant
For all of you who are worried about the NSA telling your wife that you are banging your secretary quit your wining. Even the moron judge who ruled in this case agreed the Terrorist Surveillance Program only effects calls where at least 1 party is a member of Al Qaeda and 1 part of the conversation is taking place oversees. Unless you are talking to a member of Al Qaeda oversees you don't have anything to worry about. So why are all of you so worried about freedoms for Al Qaeda members who don't even want freedom themselves.
How do they know one of the parties is a member of Al Qaeda? It's not like the publish a membership list with every ones name and address is it?
If they have any real evidence or even suspician - couldn't they get a warrant to monitor the calls?