Originally Posted by exdos
I agree totally with your comments. My experiment was offered "as is" to illustrate the general principle only. Basically, I really wanted to simply show everyone just how simple it is to test anything by on-board data-logging and that folks selling stuff, such as companies like RPI and ASR Engineering can easily produce the data if they want to. The cynic in me says that if they did use on board datalogging to prove/ disprove their products, then at the same time they would highlight the fact that static dynos are not the place to test air-intakes and show their customers that they are wasting their money on static dyno testing, and that car owners would be better off and better informed by buying and using their own datalogging kit.
Cheers. 100% in agreement. Again nice work and we appreciate it!