Originally Posted by lucid
Yes, this helps the rest of us. Seeing what you were seeing, I can now understand what you meant. I'm sure we'll get this cleaned up over time with the help of members like Ken, and additional donors like Art.
Yeah, absolutely should have included this from the get go. 1. I'm (somewhat) lazy. 2. It is never so easy to understand what others may not be seeing. 3. I viewed this initial post as preliminary data. Overall S/N during a~constant is about 3:1, ugh. Perhaps 8:1 at best, given the much smaller noise during high slope portions.