View Single Post
      08-24-2008, 03:45 PM   #49
swamp2
Lieutenant General
swamp2's Avatar
United_States
215
Rep
10,201
Posts

 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucid View Post
Well, we don't know that the data get cleaner at that point. How do you know that is pure signal? That's why I asked about the frequency of the noise during that interval in another post, which seems to be a variable across the data range you plotted and is a function of how the sensor is mounted among other things. Anyway, maybe we are all reading too much into this preliminary, and somewhat noisy, data. We'll see how things look after better mounting.
I am only saying this based on pure empericism. I saw the clean data in shift after shift (D modes only!) as the derivative of the value became very large or very small. I do agree fully that this data is VERY noisy and significant improvement needs to happen here. Hopefully Kens mount will help. The next step would be replacing the accel followed by that nice clean power supply.