Originally Posted by MalibuBimmer
He also missed the fact that the Uniform Commercial Code governs auctions and that "consideration" under those circumstances is irrelevant, so that argument by the dealer (had it been made) would have been irrelevant.
you kidding me?
a buyer need not pay for a good (with consideration) just because goods are governed by article 2 of the ucc which typically holds merchants to a higher standard and provides standard rules & duties because goods are tangible and identifiable?
as far as i know, the difference with the ucc is that consideration is not required in 2 circumstances: a firm offer or modification. as far as the meat of the contract, kool aid will tell you, oh yeah, its relevant.
do you think anyone other than an attorney, prelaw or with sales experience understands what the hell you are talking about anyway?