Originally Posted by ideliver
I disagree. His actions are memorialized in those transactions. His intention was to purchase/lease the car. His intention was to complete the transaction, but the DEALER reneged (?sp) not Ken.
While it is true that there is little at stake if he can't pay...but there would have been some sign of it before...just like there was with the DEALER...
Again, his bidding/selling history is 100% meaningless. It's true the dealer tried to back out of the deal claiming "mistake" but that's pretty much the end of the story. Ken has nothing at stake in any of this. Period.