Originally Posted by BKsBimmer
Intelligent adults should be able to disagree without resorting to name calling, don't you think? Be grown and defend your argument by backing it up with facts. So far all you've done is state an opinion which seems to be based on nothing but your hatred of Bill Clinton.
It's pretty well documented that George Bush inherited a surplus from Bill Clinton. It's also well documented that George Bush has turned that surplus into the largest national debt in history. If you claim otherwise let's see some facts to back it up.
How might I prove the lack of existence of something that never existed in the first place? The surplus was on paper, based on growth projections that were unreal, and frankly, impossible.
Tell me, what did Clinton do to further the long-term growth of the economy so that surplus would actually happen? Where did he invest?