View Single Post
      01-24-2008, 04:18 PM   #18
gbb357
Captain
25
Rep
707
Posts

Drives: IS300
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York

iTrader: (0)

Consistent?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
Thanks, this is consistent with my previous analysis as well as the N'ring regression analysis by lucid.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swamp
My post directly following his was:

OMG how many times did I have to say it??? Totally under-rated. Even conservatively this thing has a 15% total transmission and drivetrain loss. With all the extra shafts it could be closer to 20% (more efficient maybe than a RS4 drivetrain but more shafts/bearings as well). This means the engine is putting out about 560 - 590 crank hp.

Now we know the whole story...

I also just re-ran the power to weight vs. N'Ring lap time regression with 560 hp and found it to be outperforming the linear fit by a mere 1.7 seconds. Previously, we found in the regression thread that is was 25 seconds faster than the model predicted. If the car really had that good of a driver and tires as good as I expect they are the time is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING SPECIAL. It is just like a drag car getting a good drag strip time. hp rules even at the N'Ring.

Talk about dishonest and over-hyped...

That being said 560 hp for $70k is amazing and the car is darn fast.
How is this even remotely close on being consistent?