Originally Posted by footie
Sorry to push this, but what hard facts do you bring to the table and don't say simulations because they are just that, something on a computer and not true real life examples.
Looking back at you.
Read my f$%^&*@ history of posts tough guy. I am talking about the body of all of my posts and their value to the board and community. I have brought first and novel photos and videos, first and novel articles and write ups on the M3, made great early predictions on price and many performance details, worked closely with lucid on the regression analysis (spawned the idea in fact), intelligently debated the M3 vs. many other cars, participated in price prediction methods, brought a bit of science/math/physics to discussions normally void of such useful ideas, etc., etc. Until you have read 5% of my posts you are really getting way off base.
What the h$** have you added? Not much IMHO.
By the way many have commented quite positively on my simulations and their accuracy. I seem to be the only one here doing this type of work.
You are simply a master of changing the subject aren't you? This was never about me on this GT-R is teh technology king thing. Always remember that.